In it, Machiavelli lays out his thoughts on how he believed a Prince should rule his kingdom. He begins by describing various types of principalities, such as those that are acquired through conquest, and those that are handed down by heredity, and explains that different types of principalities have different concerns.
Summary[ edit ] Each part of The Prince has been commented on over centuries. The work has a recognizable structure, for the most part indicated by the author himself.
It can be summarized as follows: In the first sentence Machiavelli uses the word " state " Italian stato which could also mean " status " in order to neutrally cover "all forms of organization of supreme political power, whether republican or princely".
The way in which the word state came to acquire this modern type of meaning during the Renaissance has been the subject of many academic discussions, with this sentence and similar ones in the works of Machiavelli being considered particularly important.
More importantly, and less traditionally, he distinguishes new princedoms from hereditary established princedoms. For such a prince, "unless extraordinary vices cause him to be hated, it is reasonable to expect that his subjects will be naturally well disposed towards him".
Normally, these types of works were addressed only to hereditary princes. He thinks Machiavelli may have been influenced by Tacitus as well as his own experience, but finds no clear predecessor for this.
This categorization of regime types is also "un-Aristotelian"  and apparently simpler than the traditional one found for example in Aristotle 's Politicswhich divides regimes into those ruled by a single monarch, an oligarchyor by the people, in a democracy. Xenophonon the other hand, made exactly the same distinction between types of rulers in the beginning of his Education of Cyrus where he says that, concerning the knowledge of how to rule human beings, Cyrus the Greathis exemplary prince, was very different "from all other kings, both those who have inherited their thrones from their fathers and those who have gained their crowns by their own efforts".
More generally, Machiavelli emphasizes that one should have regard not only for present problems but also for the future ones.
Machiavelli explained that in his time the Near East was again ruled by an empire, the Ottoman Empirewith similar characteristics to that of Darius — seen from the viewpoint of a potential conqueror. In some cases the old king of the conquered kingdom depended on his lords.
These are easy to enter but difficult to hold. When the kingdom revolves around the king, with everyone else his servant, then it is difficult to enter but easy to hold.
The solution is to eliminate the old bloodline of the prince. Machiavelli used the Persian empire of Darius IIIconquered by Alexander the Greatto illustrate this point and then noted that the Medici, if they think about it, will find this historical example similar to the "kingdom of the Turk" Ottoman Empire in their time — making this a potentially easier conquest to hold than France would be.
Conquered Free States, with their own laws and orders Chapter 5 [ edit ] Gilbert Gilbert supposed the need to discuss conquering free republics is linked to Machiavelli's project to unite Italy, which contained some free republics.
As he also notes, the chapter in any case makes it clear that holding such a state is highly difficult for a prince.
Machiavelli gives three options: Ruin them, as Rome destroyed Carthageand also as Machiavelli says the Romans eventually had to do in Greece, even though they had wanted to avoid it. Go to live there or install colonies, if you are a prince of a republic. Let them keep their own orders but install a puppet regime.
Totally New States Chapters 6—9 [ edit ] Conquests by virtue Chapter 6 [ edit ] Machiavelli described Moses as a conquering prince, who founded new modes and orders by force of arms, which he used willingly to kill many of his own people. The Bible describes the reasons behind his success differently.
Princes who rise to power through their own skill and resources their "virtue" rather than luck tend to have a hard time rising to the top, but once they reach the top they are very secure in their position.
This is because they effectively crush their opponents and earn great respect from everyone else. Because they are strong and more self-sufficient, they have to make fewer compromises with their allies. Machiavelli writes that reforming an existing order is one of the most dangerous and difficult things a prince can do.
Part of the reason is that people are naturally resistant to change and reform. Those who benefited from the old order will resist change very fiercely. By contrast, those who can benefit from the new order will be less fierce in their support, because the new order is unfamiliar and they are not certain it will live up to its promises.
Moreover, it is impossible for the prince to satisfy everybody's expectations. Inevitably, he will disappoint some of his followers.- Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince examines the nature of power and his views of power are still somewhat in existence today.
I'll discuss this in this essay, emphasizing the following theses. Machiavelli discusses power over the people, dictatorial power, and power with people, shared power. The Prince (Italian: Il Principe [il ˈprintʃipe]) is a 16th-century political treatise by the Italian diplomat and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli.
From correspondence a version appears to have been distributed in , using a Latin title, De Principatibus (Of Principalities). . Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince” – Essay Sample Home / Essay Examples / World Literature / Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince” is considered to be one of the seminal works of the Renaissance.
Machiavelli thus seeks to learn and teach the rules of political power. For Machiavelli, power characteristically defines political activity, and hence it is necessary for any successful ruler to know how power is to be used. Machiavelli, NiccolÓWORKS BY MACHIAVELLI SUPPLEMENTARY BIBLIOGRAPHY NiccolÓ Machiavelli (–) was an Italian political and military theorist, civil servant, historian, playwright, and ashio-midori.com Machiavellis, an ancient middle-class family .
european history - Niccolò Machiavelli's Acquisition of Power. Essay on Cassirer, Nietzsche and Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince - Cassirer, Nietzsche and Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince When the word "Renaissance" is mentioned, an image of love for antiquity learning and fine arts usually springs to .